Sunday, January 3, 2021

2004 EX V6 6-Speed MT Honda Accord Coupe Review

For my highschool graduation in 2004, my grandparents offered me a huge gift - any new car under $30k. As they made this offer just prior to the start of my senior year (fall '03), I had lots of time to look over what options were out there. I devoured consumer car reviews, and would read brand analyses & model pamphlets like I was expected to write book reports on them every week.

I could write out who its many competitors were, but at this point, I'll just point out what separated my '04 Honda Accord V6 EX Coupe from the pack, and the features I've come to love over the years:

- 240hp, 212torque naturally aspirated V6
-- this thing could (and still does, for the most part) move. Car & Driver listed the '04 V6 Accord Coupe as 0-60mph in 5.9 seconds (link to their review at bottom.) And it takes regular gas, not super or premium! So she's relatively economical for that power. I average about 26mpg (in 2021, with +280k miles on her).

- 6 speed manual transmission
-- I enjoy driving; particularly the control of driving a manual transmission. If I recall correctly, this was one of the first years that 6-speed manuals started appearing. Most alternatives (Mazda, Toyota, etc.) were still 5-speed manuals. The clutch was so tight that even in the years that I wore it down, my dad (who taught me to drive MT) would occasionally stall out on it if he had to borrow my car. I will point out that Honda has changed the way they currently make their clutches. I had to have it replaced a half year ago, and it's not nearly as satisfying - it doesn't feel right, and, even though I've taken it to be adjusted, is still looser than I'd prefer. I also recently test drove a few 2020/21 Hondas, and can confirm that their clutches are all the same - disappointing and not nearly as sensitive or tactile as I enjoy.

- Handling
-- She's heavy - curb weight is ~3300 pounds. While some might not like that, I've been happy with it, since I always felt "grounded", even in bad weather.
-- Turn radius could be a little tighter, but for a coupe, the Accord is fairly long.

- Comfort & all-around premium quality
-- Leather heated seats, 6-CD premium disk radio head, with satellite XM & great stock speaker quality. The leather has particularly stood up to the test of time, as I doubt cloth seats would look/feel/smell as good as the Accord still does.

- Reliability

-- While in recent years I've poured more money into her than I'd have liked, I can't think of any model/brand specific malfunctions I've ever had to have fixed. The issues have been pretty generic - new rims because they were bent (probably from me curbing it when younger), new catalytic converters, and a new clutch just a few months ago. No major manufacturing issues I've ever encountered, if I recall correctly.

My only complaints are minor. In traffic, I used to kick myself for buying her (& her tight clutch), since the stop & go meant more footwork than I'd personally desire. She's small; though the front seats are great, it really is a pain in the ass to get in/out of the back seat, or place anything in the back. I know there were plenty of times when giving rides to friends that I'd regret that I bought a coupe, but that's really a critique against the style, not the particular model. She does have an adequately sized trunk. Her appearance, though... While the front is fairly ordinary (nothing particularly notable), she has a rear end that only a mother could love. I guess I could have changed it for something prettier with an aftermarket modification, but meh, I got used to it, and didn't feel like putting money into a purely aesthetic issue.

After +15 years and +280k miles, I'm going to miss her.

Pros: fun, reliable, great acceleration, acceptably economical, powerful, stable ride

Cons: styling, backseat is difficult to enter/exit, overall interior space, tight clutch & powerful engine made stop & go traffic a hassle
 
 

Saturday, September 29, 2018

What is an Eagle? (and other golf parlance)

I've been playing this dumb game on my iPad the last couple weeks - "Golf Clash."

It's super addicting, and it gives me something to do while I'm in the process of ripping my DVDs to my computer. I'm not that bad of a player, if I do say so myself. I took an "Intro to Golf" one-credit course back in college (maybe ~2006?). But I had completely forgotten what all the score terms are. So here's the list of them, from worst to best.

Bogey - one over par. Can be modified depending on how many over par it is (double-bogey is +2 over par, triple-bogey is +3, and so on.)

Par - expected score on a course.

Birdie (-1) - one shot less than par.

Eagle (-2) - two shots less than par. Most commonly achieved on par-5 courses.

Albatross (-3) - three shots less than par. Also called a "double eagle" sometimes in the US.

Condor (-4) - four shots under par. Rarest score in golf, very rarely achieved - it would end up being a hole in one on a par 5 course.

Wikipedia Source

Thursday, August 30, 2018

Why does Odin have one eye?

He traded his eye so he could drink from the Well of Urd. The guardian of the well, Mimir, demanded a payment for access to the waters, so Odin gave him his eye. Drinking the waters from that well "impart[ed] cosmic knowledge."


Link here to website with details.